Não foi possível enviar o arquivo. Será algum problema com as permissões?
Diferenças
Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.
| Ambos lados da revisão anterior Revisão anterior | Próxima revisão Ambos lados da revisão seguinte | ||
|
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 09:51] ernesto |
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 10:05] ernesto |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linha 4: | Linha 4: | ||
| ===== Papers em revisão ===== | ===== Papers em revisão ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ==== | ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ==== | ||
| Linha 76: | Linha 74: | ||
| Figure 2: Variables in the X axis are specified in the legend but not in the figure | Figure 2: Variables in the X axis are specified in the legend but not in the figure | ||
| - | === Resposta ao Rev1=== | + | === Resposta ao Rev.1=== |
| 1. There's a paragraph (lines 325-332) justifying the use of a log transform, in particular in lines 330-332 is mentioned that the log was found on previous analysis of the historical data. | 1. There's a paragraph (lines 325-332) justifying the use of a log transform, in particular in lines 330-332 is mentioned that the log was found on previous analysis of the historical data. | ||
| Linha 94: | Linha 92: | ||
| result (I'm really not sure whether it is) then this could be acceptable as a greatly reduced in size 'note' that gives the results and refers to a web document or report for details of the simulations. Certainly the geostatistical equations are not needed and are better found elsewhere (4). They are not new to the fisheries literature. Finally, in simulation work like this I am left unsure how general the results are to other areas (5). This the authors discussed some and think the results are general (maybe they are). There is little need in that case to focus on the real system (6). Otherwise, some evaluation using actual data would be useful (if there were a year when higher sampling intensity was used -- it could be subsampled to see how much the estimates changed) (7). In fairness to the authors I did not study the results in detail. Maybe someone who does will find gold in it. I did not think it was worth looking. | result (I'm really not sure whether it is) then this could be acceptable as a greatly reduced in size 'note' that gives the results and refers to a web document or report for details of the simulations. Certainly the geostatistical equations are not needed and are better found elsewhere (4). They are not new to the fisheries literature. Finally, in simulation work like this I am left unsure how general the results are to other areas (5). This the authors discussed some and think the results are general (maybe they are). There is little need in that case to focus on the real system (6). Otherwise, some evaluation using actual data would be useful (if there were a year when higher sampling intensity was used -- it could be subsampled to see how much the estimates changed) (7). In fairness to the authors I did not study the results in detail. Maybe someone who does will find gold in it. I did not think it was worth looking. | ||
| - | ===Resposta ao Rev3=== | + | ===Resposta ao Rev.3=== |
| Existem algumas inconsistências que podemos explorar na resposta a este revisor. No essencial podemos a valorizar outros resultados que obtivémos como o facto da variância da média amostral ser enviesada para a variância do estimador quando há correlação espacial, ou o procedimento para comparar desenhos com tamanhos diferentes. | Existem algumas inconsistências que podemos explorar na resposta a este revisor. No essencial podemos a valorizar outros resultados que obtivémos como o facto da variância da média amostral ser enviesada para a variância do estimador quando há correlação espacial, ou o procedimento para comparar desenhos com tamanhos diferentes. | ||
