Não foi possível enviar o arquivo. Será algum problema com as permissões?
Diferenças
Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.
| Ambos lados da revisão anterior Revisão anterior Próxima revisão | Revisão anterior Próxima revisão Ambos lados da revisão seguinte | ||
|
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 08:42] ernesto |
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 09:07] ernesto |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linha 4: | Linha 4: | ||
| ===== Papers em revisão ===== | ===== Papers em revisão ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ==== | ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ==== | ||
| Linha 49: | Linha 51: | ||
| In the discussion section, the authors justify the use of isotropic models (lines 338 to 341) but no explanation and/or justification about the log-Gaussian geostatistical model selected are given. Further explanation about the reasons of the model selection will clarify the results. | In the discussion section, the authors justify the use of isotropic models (lines 338 to 341) but no explanation and/or justification about the log-Gaussian geostatistical model selected are given. Further explanation about the reasons of the model selection will clarify the results. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <file> | ||
| + | There's a paragraph (lines 325-332) justifying the use of a log transform, | ||
| + | in particular in lines 330-332 is mentioned that the log was found on previous | ||
| + | analysis of the historical data. | ||
| + | </file> | ||
| 2. Line 241. "Table 2 summarizes the checks of the results of the parameter estimates which were considered satisfactory and coherent". | 2. Line 241. "Table 2 summarizes the checks of the results of the parameter estimates which were considered satisfactory and coherent". | ||
| It is not thoroughly clear in the text what the authors mean with satisfactory and coherent. More detail will be relevant to better understand the sampling design and survey processes | It is not thoroughly clear in the text what the authors mean with satisfactory and coherent. More detail will be relevant to better understand the sampling design and survey processes | ||
| + | |||
| + | <file> | ||
| + | ToDo: acho que temos que clarificar este parágrafo (lines 241-253) | ||
| + | </file> | ||
| 3. Line 347. "Furthermore, the results can be retained for all species with a spatial behaviour covered by these parameters". | 3. Line 347. "Furthermore, the results can be retained for all species with a spatial behaviour covered by these parameters". | ||
| Linha 58: | Linha 70: | ||
| It seems like the authors assume all the species surveyed have similar spatial behavior. This is not necessarily true, especially if the survey is targeting species with different life history traits and aggregation behaviors under different spatial scales (i.e. demersal fishes vs. sedentary invertebrates). Furthermore, the autocorrelation structure in the data is not explicitly mentioned or described. Additional information and discussion on the effect of spatial correlation for the different stocks targeted by the trawl survey on the model selection will improve the robustness of this study. | It seems like the authors assume all the species surveyed have similar spatial behavior. This is not necessarily true, especially if the survey is targeting species with different life history traits and aggregation behaviors under different spatial scales (i.e. demersal fishes vs. sedentary invertebrates). Furthermore, the autocorrelation structure in the data is not explicitly mentioned or described. Additional information and discussion on the effect of spatial correlation for the different stocks targeted by the trawl survey on the model selection will improve the robustness of this study. | ||
| + | <file> | ||
| + | We generalized our results for all species that fit in the range of the | ||
| + | covariance parameters used. This may not apply to invertebrates but certainly | ||
| + | apply for most demersal species, which are the target of our survey. This | ||
| + | sentence was revised to clarify it's aim. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The autocorrelation structure in the data is presented in Table 1 where all | ||
| + | the correlation parameters estimated are shown and in lines 231-240 we | ||
| + | describe them and the most important particularities found. | ||
| + | |||
| + | PJ: Quanto à terceira idea não percebo o que o revisor quer ... | ||
| + | </file> | ||
| Minor comments | Minor comments | ||
| Line 123: repeated word: the the | Line 123: repeated word: the the | ||
| + | |||
| Line 125: Unnecessary word: are | Line 125: Unnecessary word: are | ||
| + | |||
| Lines 183 and 206: different notation for sampling designs <LAMBDA>d and ?d | Lines 183 and 206: different notation for sampling designs <LAMBDA>d and ?d | ||
| + | |||
| Line 234: confusing sentence/notation: "...and also included in the Table (r)..." | Line 234: confusing sentence/notation: "...and also included in the Table (r)..." | ||
| + | |||
| Table 3: Summary statistics units are not specified. | Table 3: Summary statistics units are not specified. | ||
| + | |||
| Figure 1: X and Y axis legends should be specified (i.e. Longitude West and Latitude North respectively). | Figure 1: X and Y axis legends should be specified (i.e. Longitude West and Latitude North respectively). | ||
| + | |||
| Figure 2: Variables in the X axis are specified in the legend but not in the figure | Figure 2: Variables in the X axis are specified in the legend but not in the figure | ||
