Não foi possível enviar o arquivo. Será algum problema com as permissões?
Diferenças

Diferenças

Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.

Link para esta página de comparações

Ambos lados da revisão anterior Revisão anterior
Próxima revisão Ambos lados da revisão seguinte
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 08:24]
ernesto
pessoais:ernesto [2007/01/03 08:27]
ernesto
Linha 3: Linha 3:
  
 ===== Papers em revisão ===== ===== Papers em revisão =====
- 
  
 ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ==== ==== Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys ====
Linha 11: Linha 10:
 ===Mensagem da revista (18/​Dezembro/​2006)=== ===Mensagem da revista (18/​Dezembro/​2006)===
  
-//Ref.:  Ms. No. FISH896+Ref.:  Ms. No. FISH896
 Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys
 Fisheries Research Fisheries Research
Linha 36: Linha 35:
  
 Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments,​ those items will not be in this letter. ​ Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided.  ​ Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments,​ those items will not be in this letter. ​ Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided.  ​
-//+
 === Revisor 1=== === Revisor 1===
 Reviewer #1: Report on manuscript "​Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys"​ by Ernesto Jardim and Paulo J. Ribeiro Reviewer #1: Report on manuscript "​Geostatistical Assessment of Sampling Designs for Portuguese Bottom Trawl Surveys"​ by Ernesto Jardim and Paulo J. Ribeiro
Linha 76: Linha 75:
 One reviewer asks for relatively small changes, while the other feels the paper is not acceptable unless it is substantially shortened and focused on what is new. If the authors will react to the reviewers comments , I will reconsider the assessment.  ​ One reviewer asks for relatively small changes, while the other feels the paper is not acceptable unless it is substantially shortened and focused on what is new. If the authors will react to the reviewers comments , I will reconsider the assessment.  ​
  
 +==== Sampling Designs for Bottom Trawl Surveys: The Portuguese Autumn Survey Field Experience ====
  
 +Submetido à Fisheries Research em 06/​Dezembro/​2006 ({{pessoais:​fish1094.pdf|versão submetida}}).
  
 ===== Papers em desenvolvimento ===== ===== Papers em desenvolvimento =====
  
  

QR Code
QR Code pessoais:ernesto (generated for current page)