Loading…
Transcript

Identify a treatment variable

Identify the conditions (or levels) of the variable

Manipulate the treatment conditions

MANIPULATING

TREATMENT CONDITIONS

1.

Experimental

Designs

-this is the independent variable

2.

-these are the levels of the independent variable

3.

-do something different for each condition

RANDOM ASSIGNMENT

GROUP COMPARISONS

Process of a researcher obtaining scores for individuals or groups on the dependent variable and comparing the means and variance both within the group and between the groups

The process of assigning individuals at random to groups or to different groups in an experiment

Equating the groups

Spelling Accuracy

Random assignment equates groups and distributes variability between or among groups and conditions

Phase 1: Relationship Picture

Test 1 Test 2 Test 3

6 weeks 6 weeks 6 weeks

6 weeks 6 weeks 6 weeks

6 weeks 6 weeks 6 weeks

Phase 2: Timeline Picture

Phase 3: Statistical Comparisons

Error Correction Treatment

Random selection

Randomly selecting a sample from a population

Class A (control group)

Class B

(comparison group)

Class C

(experimental group)

Experimental

Designs

THREATS TO VALIDITY

What is it?

How does it work?

When do we use it?

CONTROL OVER EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN PROCESS

In an experiment you test an idea to determine whether it influences an outcome or dependent variable

Maturation

We use experiments when we want to establish possible cause and effect between independent and dependent variables

1.

Determine if an experiment is the appropriate research approach for your study

Instrumentation

or

2.

Determine activities with which to “experiment”

History

Testing

when we have two or more groups to study

3.

Assign individuals to experience the experiment (and have some individuals experience something different)

Resentful demoralization

External

Influences in the selection of participants, the procedures, the statistics, or the design likely to affect the outcome and provide an alternative explanation for our results than what was expected

4.

Determine whether those who experienced the activities (or practice or procedure) performed better on some outcome than those who did not experience the same thing

Selection

Regression

The degree to which the findings are generalizable to a population

Internal

Interaction of selection and treatment

Interaction of history and treatment

MATCHING BASED ON GENDER

Interaction of setting and treatment

INTERVENTION

This is a variable the researcher controls before the experiment starts by dividing (or "blocking") the participants into subgroups (or categories) and analyzing the impact of each subgroup on the outcome

Mortality

Problems that threaten our ability to draw correct cause-and-effect inferences that arise because of our procedures or participant experiences

The researcher forms homogeneous subgroups

POSTTEST

1.

This is the process of identifying one or more personal characteristics that influence the outcome and assigning individuals with that characteristic equally to the experimental and control groups

Then the investigator randomly assigns individuals to the control and experimental groups using each category of the variable

2.

PRETEST

Interaction with selection

Matching of Participants

Blocking Variables

Pretests and Posttests

Compensatory rivalry

Compensatory equalization

Diffusion of treatments

No Covariate

Dependent Variable

Independent Variable

This is the process of selecting people who vary little in their personal characteristics

Dependent Variable

GPA

Gender

Age

Similar:

Independent Variable

Racial Group

Degree Program

Covariate Introduced

Covariate

Thus, these characteristics or attributes are controlled in the experiment

Covariates

Homogeneous Samples

Variables that the researcher controls for using statistics and that relate to the dependent variable but that do not relate to the independent variable

EDFI 6420

Research in Education

Amanda Kochmit

Matt Priest

Lindsay Whitman Drewes

hello

Experimental Design Timeline

1979

Types of basic designs and threats elaborated upon

Statistical Advancement

e.g. Chi-square & significance of difference

Psychological experiments

................1900.........................1925..............................1950.................................1975.............................2000.....................

Procedure for comparing groups (McCall)

More complex and sophistocated experiments, involving many variables

1963

Campbell and Stanley identify 15 types of experimental designs